Contemporary Blog

BlogBud [SM]

Click Here to Visit This Writer's Site

[Last 100 Blogs] [Blog Search] [Contact Us] [FREE Site] [Home] [Writers] [Login]

  Search For A Writer

  Search For Blog

Last Posts
  1. Dream : Stargazer June 22 2022

  2. A Short History of Race in the Americas: Part two

  3. A Short History Of Race in the Americas: Part one...

  4. Stuck in the Middle....

  5. My Fellow Democrats

  6. Dream : Stargazer May 22 2022

  7. Ethics

  8. Writing Practice: Sea Turtles

  9. Dream : Stargazer April 11 2022

  10. Dream : Stargazer March 12 2022

  11. The faith of an ancient pagan

  12. Gawain and the Green Knight


  14. Auden In Love

  15. Dream : Stargazer December 26 2021

  16. Dream : Stargazer December 20 2021

  17. Dream : Stargazer December 17 2021

  18. Dreams :Stargazer October 21 2021

  19. DREAMS : Stargazer October 10 2021

  20. Dream : Stargazer September 23 2021

  21. Confessions Of An Old Fashioned Democrat

  22. The Death of Vladimir Mayakovski

  23. September 2 2021

  24. Jesus and Buddha: Two Roads Same Mountain....

  25. Dream : Stargazer August 21 2021

  26. Dream : July 23 2021 Stargazer

  27. What I think About Leviticus

  28. Taking A Break July 7 2021

  29. Dreams : Stargazer June 29 to 30 2021

  30. Dreams : Stargazer June 26 to 28 2021

  31. Dreams : Stargazer June 23 to 25 2021

  32. Dreams : Stargazer June 20 to 22 2021

  33. Dreams :Stargazer June 17 to 19 2021

  34. Dreams : Stargazer June 14 to 16 2021

  35. "The Dirty Dozen" (Old Movie Watch)

  36. Dreams : Stargazer June 11 to 13 2021

  37. Dreams : Stargazer June 8 to 10 2021

  38. Dreams : Stargazer June 5 to 7 2021

  39. Dreams : Stargazer June 2 to 4 2021

What I think About Leviticus

Fundamentalists and religious conservatives quote Leviticus and Saint Paul to condemn contemporary same gender orientation.

I find reading Leviticus to be like chewing on moth balls. So archaic, stuffy, stale and out of date. It is a code of behavior from the 6th Century B.C.E. That is 2600 years ago.

Excuse me, but I like shrimp and the two fabric cloth (cotton and polyester) that I wear for work is the most practical available and I donít for one minute believe that the Holy Spirit I worship and love has any problem with either of those infractions of the ancient Hebrew code of behavior. And I certainly donít believe that young people who curse their parents should be put to death. That would certainly solve the population problem.

To understand Leviticus you have to understand the cold war of ancient Israel: the monotheistic god of the Jews versus the pagan gods of their neighbors. The Mosaic Code of the Torah is strict in its list of behaviors that defined Jews from their Canaanite neighbors.

Their neighbors worshiped Molech. His worship included ritual sex including same gender, the idea being that to worship in that way would increase the fertility of your family, flocks and fields. It was about ancient fertility rites that humanity had probably practiced in one form another since the dawn of humanity. This is the context of Leviticus 18:22 that prohibits a man lying with a man. It is about ancient sexual politics. It does not apply to modern understanding of sexual orientation which wasnít even on the map in 600 BC.

But modern fundamentalists will quote Leviticus 22:18 (out of the context in which it was written since they eat shrimp, cut their hair, and wear cotton polyesteróall forbidden in Leviticus) to condemn contemporary same gender sexual orientation. Sorry, guys, that doesnít work.

How can they justify that? They do so because of St. Paulís apparent condemnation of same gender relationships in Corinthians and Romans. Here is where it gets touchy. How you interrupt these passages will probably be determined by your position in the literal/analytical scale of reading the Bible.

But this is fact. Paul did not use the Greek word paiderasste which was the standard word for socially acceptable male sex in ancient Greek He used malako and arsenokoitai which are words that imply the sexual abuse which was common in the First Century. So it can be reasoned that Paul was condemning the sexual abuse of young boys which was very common in those ancient days. And Christians couldnít do that. And they still canít. It is interesting that the Roman Catholic Church is still struggling with this while gays and lesbians are creating relationships built on solid moral values based on Jesusí commandment ďto love one another as I have loved you.Ē

Leviticus is not about modern sexual ethics. To base modern ethics on these texts is to ignore the insights of contemporary wisdom which spiritual progressives experience as the unfolding of divine love and compassion. The very heart of the spiritual life.

Comment Here

Excellent Good Average Poor Bad


Email Address


Sign In
Privacy Policy
Report A Site!
Last 100 Blogs
Get Your Free Site Project Ideas for kids,
Halloween, Christmas
and More

Meet Other Writers
poetry4812 smallsteps sweethumm
joyitadarling mvm judyarlinepuckett

***Remove this feature
along with ads from curran

Get your free blog site Now!
Terms of Use

[Last 100 Blogs] [Blog Search] [Contact Us] [FREE Site] [Home] [Writers] [Login]

Remove ads from curran -  Just $2 a month [ Click Here ]
Remove ads from curran -  Just $1 a month with a yearly subscription [ Click Here ]